stephencarr's Profile

  • http://blog.plasticpattern.org/
  • Feb 10, 2006
  • 6
  • 0

Latest comments made by: stephencarr

  • At the risk of entering into a circular argument; the premise of the article is basically you are surprised to find that the more advanced OS from Microsoft will cost more to run than the less advanced OS from Microsoft, but it will cost a little less to run than the equally (we hope) advanced software from Apple. Having learnt that either way you are going to upgrade to get a reliable level of computing that you require you decided to go with Apple because it comes highly recommended. I apologise for being a little unimpressed with your findings, I think anyone would have come to your conclusion, no need to tell the world about it. This article even got a front page Digg, if I was not getting so much pleasure from arguing in the comments then I might be a little upset that I wasted a couple of minutes reading it.
    stephencarr had this to say on Feb 10, 2006 Posts: 6
    Microsoft Vista: Another Reason to Switch to Apple
  • So the title of this article is completely misleading then. Vista is not really a reason to switch to Apple. The reason you are switching to Apple is because you like the idea of it and others have recommended it. Thanks for the sensational eye catching title, pity your article did not back it up and contained nothing different from a million other "hey look at me, I am switching to Apple give me a hug gang" articles. Fortunately a little interest was found in the comments so all is not lost.
    stephencarr had this to say on Feb 10, 2006 Posts: 6
    Microsoft Vista: Another Reason to Switch to Apple
  • "...as it stands, one of the best defences is that OSX is a unix system with sane user permissions. Just look - whenever you want to install an application it asks for your root password." Totally, wholeheartedly agree. I do like both the sad Apple face over a blue screen and I also am in admiration of Jobs' vision to build a system based on good old unix. Apple does really rock in many aspects, but this article sucks so hard it makes me sad. There isn't even an author profile which makes me think Steve Jobs has minions putting out newspeak articles such as this. The 1984 parody ad this article talks about, maybe it was deeply ironic, maybe Jobs is big brother?
    stephencarr had this to say on Feb 09, 2006 Posts: 6
    Microsoft Vista: Another Reason to Switch to Apple
  • You can't say Vista is a reason to jump ship until you have at least tried it. I find your whole article to be sensational and ill considered. Yes Vista will require better spec minimum hardware compared to XP, but usually more advanced software needs more advanced hardware, this does not surprise me, nor should it you. I am not going to get into the Mac vs. Windows thing because seriously the only people who give a damn about that argument are Apple fanboys. Everyone else just gets on with their computing be it on Linux, Windows or Apple. Use what suits you. It seems that as your daughter uses Macs at school might be a good reason to indeed go for a Mac. However, I don't think that Vista is the reason to, and to use the appropriate brand-love term, "switch" to Apple. I have been using Macs and PCs for years, I have had Macs with severe software problems and I have had PCs with the same. Macs crash, fact. PCs crash, fact. Which does it more often? A home built cheap-ass PC is the answer. Bad hardware configurations (usually bad/cheap memory) almost always give problems which are often seen as software problems. A Mac is built by the same people who make the OS, for this reason it usually works better on a whole, and usually costs more. You get what you pay for with hardware. I find that while PC hardware and software is ugly and a little careless in places it does do everything I need cheaply. I may have to poke about a lot to make it work properly but it does work. I don't think a PC "just works" as well as it could, then again I have friends who are new Mac owners and complain about the same thing. To a certain level you always need to RTFM. As for spyware and viruses I recommend SpyBot Search and Destroy (a free spyware tool), AVG Free (a free antivirus tool) and Firefox. These tools plus regular windows updates installed have kept me problem free. In fact, I have never had any serious virus problems and since I have stopped using IE I have no more spyware problems. Again, if you know what you are doing Windows can be good clean computing. The only real reason OS X does not suffer from malware like Windows does is because no one writes the viruses/worms/trojans/spyware for them. Corporate computing does not generally use Apple .Mail for their email system, so viruses are written for the masses, and that is Microsoft. It would be a different story if everyone used Macs, they would find a way. Having said that OS X does seem to be built from the ground up with better security than XP could hope for. In summary, Vista will be a long overdue update to the Windows platform, it will require newer hardware and it might not be everything you hoped for. Hopefully Vista will be a step closer to "just works" computing, it certainly is playing catch up with OS X. However, I can guarantee that a Vista PC will still be cheaper than a similar spec Mac. Apple hardware is stunning, but it is pricy, proper design does not come cheap (and it does not always work that well, just ask Ti Powerbook users and G1 iPod owners). /End lengthy comment.
    stephencarr had this to say on Feb 08, 2006 Posts: 6
    Microsoft Vista: Another Reason to Switch to Apple
  • True, on a locked down corporate owned machine there are some differences. I personally have never had a problem in a coffee shop. I open my laptop and select a wireless network, done. As you originally set out to say, the differences between the OSs are 12 of one and a dozen of the other. I have owned both platforms and found equal usability/reliabilty frustrations in both. When it comes to the crunch it is about a choice. Lifestyle Vs. cheap computing. Both will get the job done, but when it comes to choosing a Mac it is not just about doing the job. It is about luxuriating in eye candy whilst doing it. There is nothing wrong with good looking products, I want my products to look fantastic. But let us not twist this by saying Mac has a mystical, "can't put your finger on it" quality, they don't, the draw to Mac is obvious, and as I said before well documented. They simply look fantastic. I can point out many flaws in the actual construction of my PowerBook Ti (flaking paint, fatigued/cracked chassis, bad battery life, too hot, crappy screen etc. etc.) and the iPod, well don't get me started. The fact is, they still look great and generally they get the job done. Next time just say what you mean, a short post just saying "Hey, I love my Mac" will do, there is nothing wrong with that. It will say as much as you said above without me having to read so much and get caught up in a discussion. Got to go now, my laptop needs to restart because XP needed to patch itself, again. (Yes, secretly I want my powerbook back).
    stephencarr had this to say on May 19, 2005 Posts: 6
    Mac vs Windows, no Real Difference?
  • Well, what you did there is say you can't quuantitively say what the differences are. Then you go on to raise actual things that make the experience better, calling them "brush strokes" to make Apple sound like a work of art (which you had previously discounted as being a quality people look for in computing). The things you have said in this article are well documented attractions of the Mac platform, I think this article is just masturbatory self assurance. I think that OSX is an excellent well thougth out OS, Apple hardware is the most beautiful computer hardware in the world. Apple fan boys are the only downside, it is like a cult and that is never attractive. About those brush strokes: ================================== XP automagically configures wireless connections too, this is nothing new, just the nature of a DHCP network connection. The fact that OSX is not compramised by viruses is nothing to do with its inherent security, it is because not as many people write viruses for OSX because it is not as popular as XP, which you already recognised in your article. Mouseover dock? Is that really all that fantasic? You could have said full OpenGL desktop rendering is a brush stroke, but you went with a dock. CTRL-ALT-DEL login? Don't think so. XP boots up with a login screen, much like OSX does, has done since the beginning. CTRL-ALT-DEL brings up the task manager.
    stephencarr had this to say on May 19, 2005 Posts: 6
    Mac vs Windows, no Real Difference?